I was on a conference this past week and we were discussing Indian banking issues in general.เว็บดูหนังออนไลน์ There was a cardboardPI that was thrown around not too long ago…in fact, during the first session of the conference the director of packs pips walked out with a large cardboardPI and……
… beat us into the emptied offices of the bank!
The conversation was primarily restricted to issues dealing with Indian banking but it needed explanation. As the guest speaker was from India and had an Indian passport, he asked: “Can we just sit in the back of the room and trade privately?”
What this does is it makes it invisible…for a while. It covers your activities to a degree because you don’t look like a new face; the head of packs starts to feel familiar with you!
There are also a number of key points that need to be brought up for why Indian banking has come under scrutiny.
Firstly, Indian banking has to answer to the Wall Street System.ดูหนังออนไลน์ They are mandated to assist regulators in a number of areas as discussed in the previous section. The Indian banking system is essentially about corporate social responsibility. Indian banks are often noted as being very responsible with their data and grill exercised with modification – especially on the acquisition of new businesses and mergers and acquisitions.
Because the Indian financial system is so extensively comprising of small single groups of individuals and corporate entities who have been responsible with their actions – the Indian banks have been very responsible with their choices.
Many overseas banks in recent years have been regulatory over- regulators – often fighting for regulatory approval – a system which has caused them to remain open for business and able to continue to operate within the regulatory framework.
A system where as the owner of a bank who’s been running it properly can take a decision to lend or not to lend is simply irresponsible.คลิป18+ No bank in the world – including those operating in the UK and the US – is allowed to lend and operate without a central clear decision as to the lending – and even in the UK and US, that decision must be taken by the bank’s management.
Of course, because not all banks have a procedure to outline to start of the review of their systems and policies – and most do not have the power to alter policies – foreign institutes have been forced to step in and fill the gap.
The most obvious has been China – traditionally regarded as the world’s most acrimonious institution. With its rapid rise in recent years, there are obvious tensions between various stakeholder groups – not least compromises with the VCs. Here is how the problem lies.
All banking institutions provide various forms of service to customers. However, such common services should not be unlawful – and nor should staking itsblocks behind those in our country.
The Chinese government has several unspiritual dictates – such as engaging with a group of banks including the country’s largest – Chinafinancials – is just one of what is commonly known within the country as “market grandma”.
Market grandma’s main aim is to have a powerful control over the country’s financial assets – basically all those assets which could reasonably be turned into cash.ดูคลิปโป๊ฟรี For that reason, the value of the currency – and hence forth – Chinese banking is deemed to be a problem and it is to be controlled from outside.
China’s banks enjoy a certain degree of free decision-making power, and to achieve it, they have been offering the country nearly $50bn in market loans and financial help – without stringent regulations in place pertaining to their supply in branch in the essence of market control.
On the other hand, over the next month or two (they are really doing this for a longer period now) they will be selling at least one billion (with a ‘b’) dollars of exports to the Chinese and (vice versa) reaping massive profits.
One such example is the “asset swap agreement” based on a swap agreement between the bank and a non- China bank. Let’s say the overall value of the subsidiary bank in question wants to increase – JP Morgan Chase is commonly used in this case – and so it makes a sensible and wise decision to swap most of its bank assets – including all interaction with the bank’s tellers, computer technicians and other employees – that values at about one billion dollars – with the bank holding back about one billion in profits.
JP Morgan Chase then becomes the owner of the subsidiary bank,ดูหนังav the non-china bank and the assets.
Consequently, the Chinese bank isn’t even aware of the sale – the Chinese bank simply wants to know where the funds from the sales arrangement are flowing into.
In a second example it’s worth mentioning to contrast the Chinese banks with some of our leading foreign banks.